Books

• Kitchenham B, Budgen D, Brereton OP. 2016. Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews. (22 vols.). CRC Press.
• Basili VR, Rombach D, Schneider K, Kitche B, Pfahl D, Selby R. Basili VR, Rombach D, Schneider K, Kitchenham B, Pfahl D, Selby R (Eds.). 2007. Empirical software engineering issues. Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

Journal Articles

• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Budgen D. 2023. How Should Software Engineering Secondary Studies Include Grey Material?. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 872-882, vol. 49(2). link> doi>
• Pizard S, Acerenza F, Vallespir D, Kitchenham B. 2023. Assessing attitudes towards evidence-based software engineering in a government agency. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, Article ARTN 107101, vol. 154. link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Scanniello G, Gravino C. 2022. The Importance of the Correlation in Crossover Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2802-2813, vol. 48(8). link> doi> link> full text>
• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Budgen D. 2023. SEGRESS: Software Engineering Guidelines for REporting Secondary Studies. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1273-1298, vol. 49(3). link> doi> full text>
• Pizard S, Acerenza F, Otegui X, Moreno S, Vallespir D, Kitchenham B. 2021. Training students in evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews: a systematic review and empirical study. Empirical Software Engineering, Article 50, vol. 26(3). doi> link> full text>
• Madeyski L, Lewowski T, Kitchenham B. 2021. OECD Recommendation's draft concerning access to research data from public funding: A review. BULLETIN OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-TECHNICAL SCIENCES, Article ARTN e135401, vol. 69(1). link> doi> full text>
• Kitchenham B and Madeyski L. 2020. Inconsistencies with formulas for the standard error of the standardized mean difference of repeated measures experiments. Stat Med, 4101-4104, vol. 39(27). link> doi> full text>
• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Brereton P. 2020. Meta-analysis for families of experiments in software engineering: a systematic review and reproducibility and validity assessment. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 353-401, vol. 25(1). link> doi> full text>
• Madeyski L, Kitchenham B, Wnuk K. 2018. Introduction to the special section on Enhancing Credibility of Empirical Software Engineering. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 118-119, vol. 99. link> doi>
• Marshall C, Kitchenham B, Brereton O. 2018. Tool Features to Support Systematic Reviews in Software Engineeirng - A Cross Domain Study. e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, 79-115, vol. 12(1). doi> full text>
• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Curtin F. 2018. Corrections to effect size variances for continuous outcomes of crossover clinical trials. Stat Med, 320-323, vol. 37(2). link> doi> full text>
• Madeyski L and Kitchenham B. 2018. Effect sizes and their variance for AB/BA crossover design studies. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1982-2017, vol. 23(4). link> doi> full text>
• Madeyski L and Kitchenham B. 2017. Would wider adoption of reproducible research be beneficial for empirical software engineering research?. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 1509-1521, vol. 32(2). link> doi> full text>
• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Budgen D, Keung J, Brereton P, Charters S, Gibbs S, Pohthong A. 2017. Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 579-630, vol. 22(2). link> doi> full text>
• Abdelmaboud A, Jawawi DNA, Ghani I, Elsafi A, Kitchenham B. 2014. Quality of service approaches in cloud computing: A systematic mapping study. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 159-179, vol. 101. link> doi>
• Verner JM, Brereton OP, Kitchenham BA, Turner M, Niazi M. 2014. Risks and risk mitigation in global software development: A tertiary study. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 54-78, vol. 56(1). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA and Brereton P. 2013. A systematic review of systematic review process in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 2049-2075, vol. 55(12). doi> full text>
• Kitchenham, BA, Sjoberg, D, Dyba, T, Brereton OP, Budgen, D, Host, M, Runeson, P. 2012. Trends in the quality of human-centric software engineering experiments – A quasi-experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. doi> full text>
• Jorgensen M and Kitchenham B. 2012. Interpretation problems related to the use of regression models to decide on economy of scale in software development. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2494-2503, vol. 85(11). link> doi>
• Jorgensen M, Halkjelsvik T, Kitchenham B. 2012. How does project size affect cost estimation error? Statistical artifacts and methodological challenges. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 839-849, vol. 30(7). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Sjoberg DIK, Dyba T, Pfahl D, Brereton P, Budgen D, Host M, Runeson P. 2012. Three empirical studies on the agreement of reviewers about the quality of software engineering experiments. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 804-819, vol. 54(8). link> doi> full text>
• Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Brereton OP. 2011. Using mapping studies as the basis for further research - A participant-observer case study. Inf. Softw. Technol., 638-651, vol. 53. doi> full text>
• Budgen D, Burn AJ, Brereton OP, Kitchenham BA, Pretorius R. 2011. Empirical evidence about the UML: a systematic literature review. Softw. Pract. Exp., 363-392, vol. 41. doi>
• KAY RM, LITTLE W, KITCHENHAM BA. 1976. COMPARISON OF GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND BLOOD COMPOSITION OF TWIN AND SINGLETON CALVES. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 19-25, vol. 22(FEB). link> doi>
• Cerpa N, Bardeen M, Kitchenham B, Verner J. 2010. Evaluating logistic regression models to estimate software project outcomes. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 934-944, vol. 52(9). link> doi>
• MacDonell S, Shepperd M, Kitchenham B, Mendes E. 2010. How Reliable Are Systematic Reviews in Empirical Software Engineering?. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 676-687, vol. 36(5). link> doi>
• Zhang H, Kitchenham B, Jeffery R. 2012. Toward trustworthy software process models: an exploratory study on transformable process modeling. JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 741-763, vol. 24(7). link> doi>
• Budgen D, Burn AJ, Kitchenham B. 2011. Reporting computing projects through structured abstracts: a quasi-experiment. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 244-277, vol. 16(2). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Pretorius R, Brereton P, Budgen D, Turner M, Niazi M, Linkman S. 2010. Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering– A Tertiary Study. Information and Software Technology Journal, 792-805, vol. 52(8). doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Brereton P, Turner M, Niazi MK, Linkman S, Pretorius R, Budgen D. 2010. Refining the systematic literature review process-two participant-observer case studies. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 618-653, vol. 15(6). link> doi>
• Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Charters S, Budgen D. 2010. Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 463-479, vol. 52(5). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B. 2010. What's up with software metrics? - A preliminary mapping study. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 37-51, vol. 83(1). link> doi>
• Budgen D, Bailey J, Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Charters S. 2009. Cross-domain investigation of empirical practices. IET SOFTWARE, 410-421, vol. 3(5). link> doi>
• Rowlands GJ, Little W, Kitchenham BA. 1977. Relationships between blood composition and fertility in dairy cows--a field study. J Dairy Res, 1-7, vol. 44(1). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA and ROWLANDS GJ. 1976. DIFFERENCES IN CONCENTRATIONS OF CERTAIN BLOOD-CONSTITUENTS AMONG COWS IN A DAIRY-HERD. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 171-179, vol. 86(FEB). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Brereton OP, Budgen D, Turner M, Bailey J, Linkman S. 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 7-15, vol. 51(1). link> doi>
• Budgen D, Kitchenham BA, Charters SM, Turner M, Brereton P, Linkman SG. 2008. Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment. Empir. Softw. Eng., 435-468, vol. 13. doi>
• Keung JW, Kitchenham BA, Jeffery DR. 2008. Analogy-X: Providing statistical inference to analogy-based software cost estimation. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 471-484, vol. 34(4). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Brereton OP, Owen S, Butcher J, Jefferies C. 2008. Length and readability of structured software engineering abstracts. IET SOFTWARE, 37-45, vol. 2(1). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B. 2008. The role of replications in empirical software engineering - a word of warning. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 219-221, vol. 13(2). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Budgen D, Brereton P, Turner M, Charters S, Linkman S. 2007. Large-scale software engineering questions - expert opinion or empirical evidence?. IET SOFTWARE, 161-171, vol. 1(5). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B and Brereton P. 2007. Introduction to special section on evaluation and assessment in software engineering EASE06. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1423-1424, vol. 80(9). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Mendes E, Travassos GH. 2007. Cross versus within-company cost estimation studies: A systematic review. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 316-329, vol. 33(5). link> doi>
• Brereton P, Kitchenham B, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 571-583, vol. 80(4).
• Kitchenham BA. 2006. Evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE 05). INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 311, vol. 48(5). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Linkman S, Linkman S. 2005. Experiences of using an evaluation framework. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 761-774, vol. 47(11). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Budgen D, Brereton P, Woodall P. 2005. An investigation of software engineering curricula. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 325-335, vol. 74(3). link> doi> full text>
• Kitchenham B, Pfleeger SL, McColl B, Eagan S. 2005. An empirical study of maintenance and development estimation accuracy (vol 64, pg 57, 2002). JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 227, vol. 74(2). link> doi>
• Dyba T, Kitchenham BA, Jorgensen M. 2005. Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE SOFTWARE, 58-+, vol. 22(1). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA and Mendes E. 2004. Software Productivity Measurement Using Multiple Size Measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1023-1035, vol. 30(12). doi>
• Foss T, Stensrud E, Kitchenham BA, Myrtveit I. 2003. A simulation study of the model evaluation criterion MMRE. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 985-995, vol. 29(11). doi>
• Stensrud E, Foss T, Kitchenham BA, Myrtveit I. 2003. A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size. Empirical Software Engineering, 139-161, vol. 8(2). doi>
• Kitchenham B, Pickard LM, Linkman S, Jones PW. 2003. Modeling software bidding risks. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 542-554, vol. 29(6). link> doi>
• Lawler J and Kitchenham B. 2003. Measurement modeling technology. IEEE SOFTWARE, 68-+, vol. 20(3). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Pickard L, Linkman SG, Jones P. 2003. Modeling Software Bidding Risks. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 985-995, vol. 29(6).
• Kitchenham BA, Lawrence Pjleeger S, Pickard LM, Jones PW, Hoaglin D, El-Eman K, Rosenberg J. 2002. Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research on Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 721-734, vol. 28(8). doi>
• Kitchenham BA. 2002. The question of scale economies in software - why cannot researchers agree?. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 13-24, vol. 44(1). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA and Budgen D. 2002. Editorial - Special Issue Empirical Software Engineering. IEE Proceedings Software, vol. 149(5).
• Lawrence Pfleeger S and Kitchenham B. 2002. Principles of Survey Research Part 2 Designing a Survey. ACM Software Engineering Notes, 18-20, vol. 27(1).
• Lawrence Pfleeger S and Kitchenham B. 2002. Principles of Survey Research Part 3: Constructing a Survey Instrument. ACM Software Engineering Notes, 20-24, vol. 27(2).
• Kitchenham BA and Lawrence Pfleeger S. 2002. Principles of Survey Research Part 4: Questionairre Evaluation. ACM Software Engineering Notes, 20-23, vol. 27(3).
• Kitchenham B and Lawrence Pfleeger S. 2002. Principles of Survey Research Part 5: Populations and Samples. ACM Software Engineering Notes, 17-20, vol. 27(5).
• Kitchenham BA. 2002. The question of scale economies - why can not researcher agree?. Information and Software Technology.
• Wilkie FG and Kitchenham BA. 2001. An Investigation of Coupling, Reuse and Maintenance in a Commercial C++ Application. Information & Software Technology. doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Hughes RT, Linkman SG. 2001. Modeling Software Measurement Data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 788-804, vol. 27(9). doi>
• Rugg G, Upchurch L, Kitchenham BA. 2002. Using Card Sorts to Elicit Wed Page Quality Attributes. IEEE Software, 84-89, vol. 18(4). doi>
• Pfleeger SL and Kitchenham BA. 2001. Principles of Survey Research Part 1: Turning Lemons into Lemonade. Software Engineering Notes, 16-18, vol. 26(6).
• Pickard L, Kitchenham BA, Linkman SJ. 2001. Using simulated data sets to compare data analysis techiniques used for software cost modelling. IEE Proceedings,Software, 165-174, vol. 148(6). doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Pickard LM, MacDonald SG, Shepperd MJ. 2001. What accuracy statistics really measure. IEE Proceedings - Software, 81-85, vol. 148(3).
• Kitchenham BA, Travassos GH, von Mayrhauser A, Niessink F, Schneidewind NF, Singer J, Takada S, Vehvilainen R, Yang HJ. 1999. Towards an ontology of software maintenance. JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 365-389, vol. 11(6). link> doi>
• Pickard L, Kitchenham B, Jones P. 1999. Comments on: Evaluating alternative software production functions. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 282-283, vol. 25(2). link> doi>
• Boegh J, Depanfilis S, Kitchenham B, Pasquini A. 1999. A method for software quality planning, control, and evaluation. IEEE SOFTWARE, 69-+, vol. 16(2). link> doi>
• Pickard LM, Kitchenham BA, Jones PW. 1998. Combining empirical results in software engineering. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 811-821, vol. 40(14). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B. 1998. A procedure for analyzing unbalanced datasets. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 278-301, vol. 24(4). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B and Linkman S. 1998. Validation, verification, and testing: Diversity rules. IEEE SOFTWARE, 46-49, vol. 15(4). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Budgen D, Linkman S, Almstrum VL, Pfleeger SL. 1997. Evaluation and assessment in software engineering. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 731-734, vol. 39(11). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Linkman S, Pasquini A, Nanni V. 1997. The SQUID approach to defining a quality model. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 211-233, vol. 6(3). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Pfleeger SL, Fenton N. 1997. Towards a framework for software measurement validation - Reply. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 189, vol. 23(3). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B and Linkman S. 1997. Estimates, uncertainty, and risk. IEEE SOFTWARE, 69-74, vol. 14(3). link> doi>
• Pfleeger SL, Jeffery R, Curtis B, Kitchenham B. 1997. Status report on software measurement. IEEE SOFTWARE, 33-43, vol. 14(2). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B. 1997. The problem with function points. IEEE SOFTWARE, 29-&, vol. 14(2). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA, LINKMAN SG, LAW DT. 1994. CRITICAL-REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 43-53, vol. 9(2). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA. 1992. EMPIRICAL-STUDIES OF ASSUMPTIONS THAT UNDERLIE SOFTWARE COST-ESTIMATION MODELS. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 211-218, vol. 34(4). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA, PICKARD LM, LINKMAN SJ. 1990. AN EVALUATION OF SOME DESIGN METRICS. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 50-58, vol. 5(1). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA. 1989. SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE. MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 373-381, vol. 13(6). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA and WALKER JG. 1989. A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO MONITORING SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2-13, vol. 4(1). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA. 1987. CONTROLLING SOFTWARE PROJECTS. ELECTRONICS AND POWER, 312-315, vol. 33(5). link>
• KITCHENHAM BA and MCDERMID JA. 1986. SOFTWARE METRICS AND INTEGRATED PROJECT SUPPORT ENVIRONMENTS. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 58-64, vol. 1(1). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA. 1986. SPECIAL ISSUE ON CONTROLLING SOFTWARE PROJECTS. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2, vol. 1(1). link> doi>
• KITCHENHAM BA and TAYLOR NR. 1985. SOFTWARE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATION. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 267-278, vol. 5(4). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Rowlands GJ, Manston R, Baldry AF. 1977. Individuality and relationships with growth rate observed in the concentrations of certain blood constituents of bulls and steers reared on three systems of beef production. Br Vet J, 175-183, vol. 133(2). link> doi>
• Manston R, Kitchenham BA, Baldry AF. 1977. The influence of system of husbandry upon the blood composition of bulls and steers reared for beef production. Br Vet J, 37-45, vol. 133(1). link> doi>
• Purnell RE, Brocklesby DW, Kitchenham BA, Young ER. 1976. A statistical comparison of the behaviour of five British isolates of Babesia divergens in splenectomized calves. J Comp Pathol, 609-614, vol. 86(4). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Rowlands GJ, Manston R, Dew SM. 1975. The blood composition of dairy calves reared under conventional and rapid-growth systems. Br Vet J, 436-446, vol. 131(4). link> doi>
• Kitchenham BA, Rowlands GJ, Shorbagi H. 1975. Relationships of concentrations of certain blood constituents with milk yield and age of cows in dairy herds. Res Vet Sci, 249-252, vol. 18(3). link> doi>
• Chan KH, Heitzman RJ, Kitchenham BA. 1975. Digestibility and N-balance studies on growing heifers implanted with trienbolone acetate. Br Vet J, 170-174, vol. 131(2). link> doi>
• Sansom BF, Beer RJ, Kitchenham BA. 1974. Changes in the concentrations of serum urea nitrogen, albumin, globulin, sodium and inorganic phosphorus in weaner pigs infected with Trichuris suis. J Comp Pathol, 409-415, vol. 84(3). link> doi>

Chapters

• Kitchenham BA. 2010. What we can learn from systematic reviews. In Making Software: what really works and why we believe it. Oram A and Wilson G (Eds.). O'Reilly Media, Inc..
• Kitchenham BA and Pfleeger SL. 2007. Personal Opinion Surveys. In Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Shull F, Singer J, Sjøberg DIK (Eds.). Springer Verlag.
• Kitchenham BA. 2007. Empirical Paradigm - The role of experiments. In Empirical software engineering issues. Basili VR, Rombach D, Schneider K, Kitchenham B, Pfahl D, Selby R (Eds.). Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

Other

• Pizard S, Vallespir D, Kitchenham B, Soc IEEEC. 2022. A longitudinal case study on the effects of an evidence-based software engineering training. 2022 ACM/IEEE 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING (ICSE-SEET 2022) (pp. 1-13). link> doi> full text>
• Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Brereton P, Machinery AC. 2019. Problems with Statistical Practice in Human-Centric Software Engineering Experiments. PROCEEDINGS OF EASE 2019 - EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (pp. 134-143). link> doi> full text>
• Madeyski L, Kitchenham B, IEEE. 2018. Effect Sizes and their Variance for AB/BA Crossover Design Studies. PROCEEDINGS 2018 IEEE/ACM 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE) (p. 420). link> doi>
• Marshall C, Brereton OP, Kitchenham BA. 2015. Tools to Support Systematic Reviews in Software Engineering: A Cross-Domain Survey using Semi-structured Interviews. ACM. full text>
• Kitchenham B, Li Z, Burn A. 2011. Validating Search Processes in Systematic Literature Reviews. EAST 2011: EVIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT OF SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (pp. 3-9). link>
• Brereton OP, Kitchenham B, Sjoberg DIK, Budgen D, Dyba T, Host M, Runeson P, Pfahl D. 2010. Can we evaluate the quality of software engineering experiments?.
• Kitchenham B, Sjøberg DIK, Brereton OP, Budgen D, Dybå T, Höst M, Runeson P, Pfahl D. 2010. Can we evaluate the quality of software engineering experiments?. New York: ACM. doi>
• Kitchenham B and Brereton P. 2010. Problems Adopting Metrics from Other Disciplines. New York: ACM. doi>
• Brereton OP, Kitchenham B, Budgen D. 2010. The Educational Value of Mapping Studies of Software Engineering Literature. ACM.
• Zhang H, Kitchenham B, Pfahl D. 2010. Software Process Simulation Modeling: An Extended Systematic Review. NEW MODELING CONCEPTS FOR TODAY'S SOFTWARE PROCESSES (pp. 309-+, vol. 6195). link>
• Brereton OP, Kitchenham B, Budgen D. 2010. The value of mapping studies - A participant-observer case study. BCS eWiC.
• Verner JM, Sampson J, Tosic V, Abu Bakar NA, Kitchenham BA. 2009. Guidelines for Industrially-Based Multiple Case Studies in Software Engineering. RCIS 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE (pp. 313-+). link> doi>
• Brereton OP, Kitchenham B, Budgen D, Li Z. 2009. An Evaluation of Quality Checklist Proposals - A participant-observer case study. BCS eWiC.
• Charters S, Budgen D, Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton OP, Linkman S. 2009. Objectivity in Research: Challenges from the Evidence-Based Paradigm. ASWEC 2009: 20TH AUSTRALIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS (pp. 73-+). link> doi>
• Brereton OP, Budgen D, Charters S, Turner M, Kitchenham B, Linkman S. 2009. Objectivity in Research: Challenges from the Evidence-Based Paradigm. IEEE Computer Society Press. doi>
• Zhang H, Kitchenham B, Jeffery R. 2009. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Software Process Simulation Modeling: Conversion and Comparison. ASWEC 2009: 20TH AUSTRALIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS (pp. 345-+). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Turner M, Niazi M, Linkman S, Pretorius R, Budgen D, IEEE. 2009. The Impact of Limited Search Procedures for Systematic Literature Reviews - A Participant-Observer Case Study. ESEM: 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT (pp. 337-+). link> doi>
• Brereton OP, Budgen D, Turner M, Kitchenham B. 2008. Using Mapping Studies in Software Engineering.
• Brereton OP, Bailey J, Turner M, Budgen D, Kitchenham B, Charters S. 2008. Lessons from a cross-domain investigation of empirical practices.
• Brereton OP, Turner M, Kitchenham B, Budgen D. 2008. Lessons learnt undertaking a large-scale systemic literature review.
• Brereton OP, Kitchenham B, Budgen D. 2008. Using a Protocol Template for Case Study Planning.
• Kitchenham B, Al-Khilidar H, Babar MA, Berry M, Cox K, Keung J, Kurniawati F, Staples M, Zhang H, Zhu L. 2008. Evaluating guidelines for reporting empirical software engineering studies. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (pp. 97-121, vol. 13). link> doi>
• Zhang H, Kitchenham B, Pfahl D. 2008. Reflections on 10 years of software process simulation modeling: A systematic review. MAKING GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT A SUCCESS STORY (pp. 345-+, vol. 5007). link>
• Zhang H, Keung J, Kitchenham B, Jeffery R, Society IEEEC. 2008. Semi-quantitative modeling for managing software development processes. ASWEC 2008: 19TH AUSTRALIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS (pp. 66-+). link> doi>
• Zhang H, Kitchenham B, Pfahl D. 2008. Software Process Simulation Modeling: Facts, Trends and Directions. APSEC 2008:15TH ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS (pp. 59-+). link> doi>
• Brereton OP, Budgen D, Kitchenham B, Turner M. 2007. 2nd International Workshop on Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering: Overview and Introduction. Proc of 2nd International Workshop on Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering at ICSE 2007. IEEE Computer Society Press. doi>
• Budgen D, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Turner M. 2007. 2nd international workshop on realising evidence-based software engineering (REBSE-2). 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: ICSE 2007 COMPANION VOLUME, PROCEEDINGS (pp. 137-+). link> doi>
• Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE (pp. 571-583, vol. 80). link> doi>
• Brereton OP, Budgen D, Kitchenham B. 2007. Preliminary results of a study of the completeness and clarity of structured abstracts. BCS eWiC.
• Brereton OP, Bailey J, Budgen D, Turner M, Kitchenham B, Linkman S. 2007. Evidence relating to Object-Oriented software design: A survey.
• Kitchenham BA, Pickard LM, Linkman SG, Jones PW. 2002. A Process for Evaluating a Software Bidding Model. doi>
• Budgen D, Brereton P, Kitchenham B, Linkman S, acm. 2005. International workshop on realising evidence-based software engineering. ICSE 05: 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS (p. 687). link>
• Kitchenham BA and Mendes E. 2004. A comparison of cross-company and within-company effort estimation models for Web Applications. Proceedings 8th International Conference on Empirical assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2004).
• Wilkie FG, Ware MP, Kitchenham BA, Harmer TJ. 2004. Evaluating the Sensitivity of Coupling Metrics to Evolving Software Systems. Software Measurement - Research and Application. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Metrics and DASMA Software Metrik Kongress.
• Kitchenham BA, Dyba T, Jorgensen M. 2004. Evidence-based Software Engineering. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of Software Engineering (ICSE '04). doi>
• Mendes E and Kitchenham BA. 2004. Further Comparison of Cross-Company and Within Company Effort Estimation Models for Web Applications. Proceedings 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics.
• Kitchenham BA. 2004. The Failure of Quality. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Software Quality.
• Kitchenham BA, Fry J, Linkman SG. 2004. The case against cross-over designs in software engineering. STEP 2003Proceedings Eleventh International Workshop Software Technology and Engineering Practice.
• Kitchenham BA, PFleeger SL, McColl B, Eagan S. 2001. An Empirical Study of Maintenance and Development Estimation Accuracy. doi>
• Stensrud E, Foss T, Kitchenham BA, Myrtreit I. 2002. An Empirical Validation of the Relationship between the Magnitude of Relative Error and Project Size. Proceedings 8th Software Metrics Symposium.
• Pickard LM, Kitchenham BA, Linkman SG, Jones PW. 2002. Evaluation of the Software Bidding Model.
• Pickard LM, Kitchenham BA, Linkman SG, Jones PW. 2002. Software Bidding Model Implementation.
• Kitchenham BA, Pickard L, Linkman SG, Jones P. 2001. A Preliminary Risk-Based Software Bidding Model. The 4th European Conference on Software Measurement and ICT Control in Co-operation with DASMA. FESMA-DASMA 2001 Proceedings.
• Kitchenham BA, Pickard L, Linkman SG, Jones P. 2001. A Preliminary Risk-Based Software Bidding Model.
• Kitchenham B. 2001. The case against software benchmarking. FESMA-DASMA 2001 Proceedings.
• Tsagias M and Kitchenham B. 2000. An evaluation of the business object approach to software development. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE (pp. 149-156, vol. 52). link> doi>
• Wilkie FG and Kitchenham BA. 2000. Coupling measures and change ripples in C++ application software. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE (pp. 157-164, vol. 52). link> doi>
• De Panfilis S, Kitchenham B, Morfuni N. 1997. Experiences introducing a measurement program. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY (pp. 745-754, vol. 39). link> doi>
• Kitchenham B, Pasquini A, Anders U, Boegh J, dePanfilis S, Linkman S. 1997. Automating software quality modelling, measurement and assessment. RELIABILITY, QUALITY AND SAFETY OF SOFTWARE-INTENSIVE SYSTEMS (pp. 43-53). link>
• KITCHENHAM BA and LINKMAN SJ. 1990. DESIGN METRICS IN PRACTICE. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY (pp. 304-310, vol. 32). link> doi>
• KOK PAM, KITCHENHAM BA, KIRAKOWSKI J, COMMUNITIES CE. 1990. THE MERMAID APPROACH TO SOFTWARE COST ESTIMATION. ESPRIT 90 (pp. 296-314). link>
• Kitchenham BA, Brereton OP, Budgen D. Protocol for Extending an existing Tertiary study of Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. full text>
• Kitchenham BA, Mendes E, Travassos GH. Protocol for Systematic Review of Within- and Cross-Company Estimation Models. full text>