Programme/Approved Electives for 2025/26
None
Available as a Free Standing Elective
No
This is your chance to pursue, in depth, an area of academic interest by developing your own research question and undertaking the necessary research.This two-semester module requires you to complete an extended piece of supervised research over an entire academic year and concludes with the submission of a dissertation. Although you will be supported by a member of academic staff whose interests and expertise relate to your agreed topic, this module requires real self-discipline to undertake it successfully. You will be required to demonstrate independence of thought and action. This does not mean, however, that a dissertation needs to be a lonely task. You will be encouraged to participate in a number of active group workshops specifically designed for the key stages of undertaking a dissertation (e.g. developing a research topic and formulating a research question, maximising reading and literature review strategies and writing up and presenting a dissertation). Alongside the workshops, a dissertation workbook has been developed to promote and scaffold independent project management.
Aims
This module provides students with an opportunity to devise and undertake their own extended research project, under the guidance of a supervisor. Students undertaking this module will have the opportunity to develop and demonstrate skills in ways not normally tested by taught modules, including the ability to:a) organise their own work over several months;b) locate (with guidance, where appropriate) essential material;c) organise a large amount of material on a single topic or theme;d) make use, where appropriate, of the interdisciplinary nature of the Keele degree programme; ande) communicate clearly and effectively in an extended piece of written work.
Talis Aspire Reading ListAny reading lists will be provided by the start of the course.http://lists.lib.keele.ac.uk/modules/law-30083/lists
Intended Learning Outcomes
Formulate a viable legal research question: 1Justify the choice of an appropriate research methodology: 1Demonstrate effective project management and self-directed learning skills: 2Evidence structured progress through the production of a work-in-progress report: 2Independently produce a substantial, well-structured and persuasive piece of legal writing: 3
Group workshops: 10 hours (5 x 2-hour sessions)Individual supervision: 2 hours (4 x 30-minute meetings)Self-directed reading, proposal and dissertation preparation = 288 hours
Description of Module Assessment
1: Research Proposal weighted 10%Research ProposalStudents will produce a research proposal not exceeding 750 words, which will be submitted in the latter part of Semester 1. Each proposal will be first marked by the module leader (or an independent marker when the module leader is also the student's supervisor) and second marked by the student’s supervisor against clear criteria. If a mark cannot be agreed, an independent third marker will be asked to adjudicate.
2: Report weighted 10%Work-in-Progress ReportStudents will produce a work-in-progress report not exceeding 750 words, which will be submitted in the early part of Semester 2. The report will comprise a proposed dissertation structure with brief annotations and a concise narrative on project development since the proposal. Each report will be first marked by the module leader (or an independent marker when the module leader is also the student's supervisor) and second marked by the student’s supervisor against clear criteria. If a mark cannot be agreed, an independent third marker will be asked to adjudicate.
3: Dissertation weighted 80%DissertationStudents will produce a final dissertation with a maximum word limit of 8000 words (excluding footnotes and bibliography), which will be submitted at the end of Semester 2. Each dissertation will be marked by two members of staff: (i) the student's supervisor; and (ii) a member of staff other than the student's supervisor. Both will agree a mark jointly. If a final mark cannot be agreed, an independent third marker will be asked to adjudicate.