Programme/Approved Electives for 2026/27
None
Available as a Free Standing Elective
No
What makes a work of literature classic? What do we mean when we call something an example of popular culture? This module invites you to compare classic texts (such as Pride and Prejudice, The Great Gatsby, and The Tempest) with adaptations that share their themes or challenge their values. You will learn new ways to think about why some texts are called classics and some are not, and enrich your understanding of the way that texts interact with one another across genres.
Aims
To develop students' skills in the analysis and interpretation of canonical literature and its adaptation into film/TV texts.To introduce students to concepts, theories, and contexts relevant to the adaptation of literary 'classics'.To give students opportunities to produce original writing and products based on their critical engagement with literature on screen.To develop students' capabilities in studying English at university level, including independent research and critical thinking.
Intended Learning Outcomes
critically analyse adaptations with respect to their aesthetic strategies, sociocultural contexts, and relationship to literary works: 1,2demonstrate understanding of and apply concepts relevant to screen reworkings of literary texts, including theories of adaptation and appropriation: 1,2research topics related to screen adaptations of literary works: 1,2communicate findings of research and interpretation in assessed work: 1,2
24: Lectures24: Workshops and seminars152: Preparation for classes: reading and viewing texts, and guided study40: Writing their own and reading other students' discussion threads60: Researching and writing the essay
Description of Module Assessment
1: Exercise weighted 40%Discussion ThreadsStudents will post responses to discussion thread prompts set up by the tutor. Five posts of 300 words, totalling c. 1,500 words.
2: Essay weighted 60%Researched essayStudents will write an essay and commentary comprising 2,500 words, choosing from a list of ten essay questions. Their work will be broken down as follows:
(1) a 1,800-word argument-based essay
(2) a 200-word reflective commentary on their essay-writing skills and areas on which they desire specific feedback;
(3) a 500-word annotated bibliography of three secondary sources used, each entry comprising a summary of the source and an account of how they used it.