"... freedom is nothing but the correlative development of apparatuses of security."
(Michel Foucault, Sécurité, Territoire, Population)
What political rationalities and general theories of politics emerge
when life rather than sovereign territoriality becomes the referent object
of power?
What happens to power relations when power takes life as its
referent object? What mechanisms and technologies are deployed by power
relations that take life as their field of formation? What mechanisms
and micro practices of governmental regulation emerge when the basic biological
features of the human species become the object of political strategisation?
But how has the life of populations changed since Foucault first
interrogated biopower? What is the status, for example, of population
science today? How indeed has our understanding of what it is to be a
living thing changed in the wake of the molecular and the digital revolutions?
What new technologies have emerged around the new life sciences and the population science of the 21st century? How have these changed the field of formation of biopolitical power relations? What new political rationalities have they introduced? What new micro practices of power do they employ? How have they re-engineered more traditional biopolitical micro practices of power; such as those employed, for example, by medicine, surveillance, urban planning or insurance?
In Sécurité, Territoire, Population Foucault concludes
that biopolitics simply is a dispositif de sécurité.
As a dispositif de sécurité biopolitics secures by instantiating
a general economy of the contingent throughout all the processes of re-productive
circulation which impinge upon species existence as a whole.
How has this dispositif de sécurité been developing throughout
the last century in particular? How has the contingent developed? What
kind of freedom does the biopolitics of security instantiate and regulate?




